Is "(1) All humans are mortal. (2) Socrates is mortal ...
philosophy.stackexchange.com › questions › 55919Sep 30, 2018 · Premise 1: All humans are mortal. Premise 2: Socrates is mortal. Conclusion: Socrates is human. This reasoning is unsound because the middle term (mortal) is undistributed. Thus there is no idea which links the two premises; together they cannot add up to any broader conclusion. The general form of both premises is an A statement: All P are Q. "All P", by definition, says something about every member of the set P.
Fallacy Quiz Flashcards | Quizlet
quizlet.com › 16877753 › fallacy-quiz-flash-cardsEnthymeme takes away one of the premises "All humans are mortal, I am mortal." Induction reasoning from detailed facts to general principles, You are mortal, you are mortal you are mortal, humans are mortal. Slothful Induction The conclusion of a strong inductive argument is denied despite evidence to the contrary Hasty Generalization