The CORE-OM covers four domains: well-being, problems/symptoms, functioning and risk, and sums up in two total scores: the mean of All items, and the …
1. The total CORE OM score can be calculated by adding up the scores for each question (the ‘total score’), dividing by the number of questions completed (34 if all are completed) and multiplying by 10. Alternatively, the total score can be used to look up the clinical score on the look-up table. 2.
Key points in the scoring of the CORE Outcome Measure are as follows: • Each item within the CORE Outcome Measure is scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ( ...
Mar 28, 2020 · Scoring. The original scoring was the mean across the items, i.e. between 0 and 4 as the scoring of the item responses is from 0 to 4. After that, as some users didn’t like using two decimal places, scores have often been reported as a “clinical score” by multiplying that by ten, giving scores between 0 and 40.
WebSince its development the CORE-OM has been validated with samples from the general population, NHS primary and secondary care, and in older adults. ... Interpretation …
WebCORE-OM (Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure) is a common self-report measure of global distress. It can be used as an initial screening tool and as an …
Scores are presented as a total raw score (range 0-136) and a client average response from 0 – 4, which represents that average response on the likert scale and allows for standardised comparison across subscales. Higher scores represent poorer overall functioning. In addition, scores are presented as a … See more
Interpretation. Higher total raw scores total (range 0-136) represent poorer overall functioning and scores are also presented as a the mean score ( ...
CORE-OM (Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure) is a common self-report measure of global distress. It can be used as an initial screening ...
Aug 31, 2018 · The scoring range of the CORE-OM is between 0 and 4, with 4 being the highest level of severity. As can be seen from the image above, some items are positively framed (items 3 and 4). For these items the scoring range is reversed. The client is guided to consider each statement and how often they have felt like this over the past week.
Scoring and Interpretation. Scores are presented as a total raw score (range 0-136) and a client average response from 0 – 4, which represents that average ...
Webb. This means that if the client scores 20 at the beginning of therapy and 9 at the end of therapy this would count as ‘clinical change’. Likewise if the client scored 10 at the …
Total Score and Total Mean Score · Each item within the CORE Outcome Measure is scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) · The total score is ...
WebScoring and Interpretation. Scores are presented as a total score (0 to 40) as well as a mean score (between 0 – 4). Higher scores indicate higher levels of general …
The original scoring was the mean across the items, i.e. between 0 and 4 as the scoring of the item responses is from 0 to 4. After that, as some users didn't ...
WebPDF | On Jan 1, 1998, Chris Evans and others published The CORE outcome measure: user's manual (version 2.1) | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
Jan 2, 2018 · Our recommended CORE–OM cut-off score of 10 between clinical and general populations (see Fig. 1) has the advantage of a straightforward interpretation, equivalent to a mean item score of 1.0.